{"id":19076,"date":"2026-09-17T12:02:33","date_gmt":"2026-09-17T16:02:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/appliedex.com\/?page_id=19076"},"modified":"2026-09-22T13:19:40","modified_gmt":"2026-09-22T17:19:40","slug":"evaluation-de-la-preparation-du-sol-pour-lautomatisation-des-entrepots","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/appliedex.com\/fr\/warehouse-automation-floor-readiness-assessment\/","title":{"rendered":"\u00c9valuation de la pr\u00e9paration des sols pour l'automatisation des entrep\u00f4ts"},"content":{"rendered":"\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
Services | Automation Ready Flooring<\/div>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Warehouse Automation Floor Readiness Assessment<\/h1>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
Is your warehouse floor ready for AGVs, AMRs, VNA and ASRS?<\/div>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tTake the 2-minute assessment<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
AGV & AMR<\/div>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Free and guided movement<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
VNA<\/div>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Defined wheel paths<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
ASRS & grid<\/div>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Fixed footprints and datums<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
ASTM · TR34 · VDMA<\/div>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Named acceptance methods<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t

\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t01<\/span>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Compatibility, Not Just Flatness<\/h2>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

The robots arrive next Monday. The floor has handled forklifts for fifteen years. Why would it suddenly become a design problem?<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

That question comes up late on a lot of automation projects. A conventional warehouse tolerates conditions that a high-cycle automated system notices immediately. Among them are a small joint step crossed thousands of times a shift, a cross-aisle slope that leans a tall load, a polished patch that changes wheel traction, and gradual settlement that shifts a fixed grid away from its datum. The slab can be structurally sound and still be operationally incompatible with the machine about to run on it.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

So the right question isn’t “Is the floor flat?” It is whether the existing or proposed floor provides the geometry, continuity, surface behaviour and structural support this automation system needs, at its actual speed, payload and movement pattern. That is what a warehouse automation floor readiness assessment answers.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Core engineering principle.<\/strong> Automation readiness is a compatibility study. The governing requirement comes from the actual equipment, route and structural interface. Published floor standards provide the measurement framework, but the OEM or project specification may impose different or additional limits.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t

\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t02<\/span>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Start With the Machine, Not the Floor<\/h2>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

What the assessment needs before anyone picks up an instrument<\/h3>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

A floor survey can generate millions of measurements and still answer the wrong question if nobody knows what the equipment will do. Before selecting a standard or an instrument, we collect the automation inputs that translate directly into floor sensitivity.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Movement and vehicle geometry.<\/h3>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Free roaming, guided path, fixed grid or fixed supports. Wheelbase, track width, wheel count and diameter, caster arrangement, lift height, payload height, centre of gravity and allowable mast lean.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Operating envelope and wheel interface.<\/h3>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Speed, acceleration, braking, turning radius, docking accuracy and traffic frequency. Wheel material, contact pressure, traction-control logic and sensitivity to steps, joints or debris.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Navigation and fixed loads.<\/h3>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

LiDAR\/SLAM, QR or fiducial markers, magnetic or wire guidance, reflectors, vision or hybrid. Rack legs, grid columns, rails, conveyors, ports, chargers and concentrated support reactions.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Environment and acceptance basis.<\/h3>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Freezer conditions, washdown, contamination, dust control, ESD-sensitive product and cleaning chemistry, plus the document that governs. That means the OEM spec, integrator spec, structural criteria and the named floor standard, with edition.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t

\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t03<\/span>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Classify the Traffic Before Choosing the Floor Metric<\/h2>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Three automation families can share one building and still need completely different descriptions of the floor. Calling all of it “robotics” is where readiness studies go wrong.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Free Movement<\/h3>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

AMRs and free-routing AGVs. Many possible wheel paths; a local defect can be hit from several directions. Measure area-based geometry plus local defects, joints and surface behaviour. OEM criteria govern.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Defined Movement<\/h3>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

VNA turret trucks and rail, wire or magnetic guided paths. The same wheels follow the same tracks every cycle. Measure directly in the actual wheel paths, using Fmin, TR34 DM, VDMA or the project\/OEM method.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Fixed Footprint<\/h3>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

AutoStore and grid systems, ASRS supports, rack and rail systems. Equipment is tied to a support grid, rail or datum. Dense elevation mapping, structural support checks and OEM footprint tolerances.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Why this matters: ASTM E1155\/E1155M-23 states that FF\/FL results are used primarily for randomly trafficked floors and should not be used to enforce tolerances on floors intended primarily for fixed-path vehicle systems. For defined traffic, measure the paths the wheels will actually follow.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t

\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t04<\/span>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Read the Floor in Four Layers<\/h2>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

A useful readiness study treats the floor as four interacting layers. A pass in one cannot cancel a failure in another. A structurally adequate slab can have unacceptable joint steps, a geometrically excellent floor can carry a coating too slippery for the selected wheel, and a smooth surface can still move under concentrated load.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Geometry<\/h3>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

What shape does the machine see? Flatness, levelness, waviness, cross-slope, abrupt elevation changes and relationship to datum, sampled at the gauge length that matches the machine rather than one global number.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Joints, Cracks & Transitions<\/h3>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Where continuity is interrupted. Width, step, edge condition, movement, load transfer and crossing angle. For brownfield work the key deliverable is a joint-by-joint defect map tied to robot routes.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Surface Performance<\/h3>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

The robot does not drive on a number. The top few millimetres form the wheel and sensor interface, covering friction, micro-roughness, abrasion, dusting, gloss, cleanliness, ESD and moisture.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Structure<\/h3>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Can the slab carry the automation? Fixed racks, grids, rails and ASRS structures bring concentrated reactions, settlement limits and sustained loads the original warehouse never saw.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t

\n\t\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

A small floor error becomes a large machine error.<\/strong> If the left and right wheel tracks of a VNA truck differ by 2 mm across a 1.5 m track width, the cross-aisle angle is roughly 1.33 mrad. Project that to a 12 m lift height and the geometric lateral offset is about 16 mm, before tire deflection, mast flexibility, dynamic motion and load movement are added. This isn’t a substitute for the truck manufacturer’s stability model; it shows why a few millimetres at the floor matter at height.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tSee the specifier checklist<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\"Forklift\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Cross-aisle elevation difference projected to mast height. Lean is exaggerated for clarity. Click to enlarge.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t

\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t05<\/span>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Surface Performance: What We Test and Why<\/h2>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Depending on the system, the readiness study may need to characterize the surface as well as the geometry. Each property comes with a caution, because there is no universal robot value for any of them.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Friction<\/h3>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Will the wheel accelerate, brake and turn predictably? Specify both the test method and the acceptance value; there is no universal AGV\/AMR coefficient.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Roughness<\/h3>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Does microtexture support traction without wheel wear or vibration? Coating-prep CSP is not a robot ride-quality metric.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Gloss & Optics<\/h3>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Could reflective or non-uniform areas affect optical navigation or cameras? ISO 2813 measures gloss; the acceptable value is an OEM requirement.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Abrasion & Dusting<\/h3>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Will repeated routes create wear, fines or wheel contamination? Abrasion tests are comparative; they do not predict years of service.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

ESD<\/h3>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Does the process require controlled floor resistance? Project-specific, coordinated with the grounding strategy, and only where the product or OEM requires it.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Moisture<\/h3>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Can a planned coating, levelling layer or ESD finish be installed reliably? Use the manufacturer’s limits and a defined method such as ASTM F2170.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Structure note: one public AutoStore FAQ gives a 16-bin-high, 30 kg-per-bin configuration requiring 2,000 kg\/m² (409 lb\/ft²) floor strength. That is an example for a stated configuration, not a universal design value. Project loads and misalignment criteria come from the current OEM\/integrator package and are reviewed with the structural engineer. A surface-readiness conclusion never implies structural adequacy unless structural evaluation is in scope.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t

\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t06<\/span>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

The Instrument Follows the Requirement<\/h2>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

A dense point cloud can be extremely useful and still be the wrong contractual calculation for a specified wheel-path method. An excellent FF\/FL report can say almost nothing about a VNA wheel path that was never directly measured. We match the method to the acceptance question.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

ASTM E1155 FF\/FL Profiler<\/h3>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Randomly trafficked slab flatness and levelness. Exact edition, sampling plan and minimum local criteria reported.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Defined-Path Profileograph<\/h3>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Known VNA\/AGV wheel paths. Track geometry configured to Fmin, TR34 DM, VDMA or the project method.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Total Station \/ Digital Level<\/h3>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Precise elevations, datum networks, control and support points, with documented closure and calibration.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

3D Laser Scanner<\/h3>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Dense topology, high\/low mapping, transitions and remediation planning. Not automatically an E1155 or defined-path test.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Local Gauges & Profilometry<\/h3>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Joint step, gap, local transition and microtexture, with stated resolution and acceptance rule.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t

\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t07<\/span>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Why You Need a Warehouse Automation Floor Readiness Assessment<\/h2>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Automation gets specified around throughput and payload. The floor it runs on is usually assumed to be adequate because it has carried forklifts for years. That assumption is the most expensive one on the project.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

By the time the robots arrive, the floor is under racking, under power and under a schedule. A tolerance problem found at commissioning stops being a concrete question and becomes a shutdown, a crane rental and a re-pour in a live building. Measuring first moves that discovery to the point where the correction is still local, planned and cheap.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

It also settles the question with data rather than opinion. Without measurements, the conversation between the client, the integrator and the flooring contractor runs on assertion, and the risk transfers quietly to whoever signs last. With a survey tied to the named acceptance method and the routes the equipment will actually run, everyone works from the same evidence and remediation is scoped to the zones that need it.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Find it on paper, not at commissioning.<\/strong> Every other version of this conversation happens after the racking is up, the power is in and the schedule is fixed.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
From the field<\/div>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t
<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t
<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t
<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t
<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t
<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t
<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t08<\/span>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Greenfield and Brownfield Need Different Timing<\/h2>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

One asks “How do I specify it before the pour?” The other asks “Can this floor work?”<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
1<\/div>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Greenfield: translate automation requirements before the slab is designed<\/h3>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

The least expensive millimetre to correct is the one that never gets built. Automation criteria should shape slab design, pour layout, joint locations, finishing method, survey plan and acceptance timing before placement begins. We help the design team decide which areas are random traffic, which are defined traffic and which carry fixed equipment footprints, so each zone gets the correct measurement and acceptance method.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t

\n\t\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\"Greenfield\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Pour and joint layout with the three traffic zones marked. Click to enlarge.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t

\n\t\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\"Brownfield\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Readiness heat map with the proposed robot routes overlaid. Click to enlarge.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
2<\/div>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Brownfield: survey what exists, along the routes that will actually operate<\/h3>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

A brownfield assessment starts with the proposed equipment footprint and route map, overlaid on the existing slab, joints and previous repairs. The field program then prioritizes the high-cycle zones. Those are narrow aisles, turns, docking and charging positions, transfer points, ports and conveyor interfaces. AutoStore’s own brownfield guidance makes the same point. Survey first, then correct locally with grinding, patching or levelling.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t

\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t09<\/span>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

A Defensible Readiness Workflow<\/h2>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

From design input to commissioning baseline<\/h3>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
1<\/div>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Design Input Review<\/h3>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Collect OEM\/integrator criteria, drawings, route or footprint, loads, navigation, wheel geometry and operating conditions.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
2<\/div>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Baseline Survey and Testing<\/h3>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Measure the properties that correspond to the machine, covering geometry, joints, surface tests and structural investigation as required.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
3<\/div>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Gap Assessment<\/h3>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Compare measured conditions to the named requirement, zone by zone. Separate non-compliance from advisory observations.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
4<\/div>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Remediation Design<\/h3>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Grinding, patching, joint repair, overlay, surface treatment or structural work by defect type. Localized correction wherever it is sufficient.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
5<\/div>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Re-test and Acceptance<\/h3>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Re-measure corrected zones with the same governing method. Pre- and post-remediation data preserved.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
6<\/div>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Commissioning Baseline<\/h3>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Archive route maps, point clouds, profiles, joint inventory and surface data so future changes can be told apart from original conditions.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t

\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t10<\/span>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

What You Get, and What to Ask For<\/h2>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

What the Readiness Report Contains<\/h3>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t